"A prophet is one who sees far ahead, but also sees everything around them, because the future begins today (Konstantin Eduardovich Tsiolkovsky, 1857-1935)"


This article is written during a period of heightened Russophobia and on the eve of Russia's youngest national holiday: Day of Russia. It is celebrated on June 12th. On this day in 1990, the Declaration on the State Sovereignty of the RSFSR was adopted at the First Congress of People's Deputies of the Russian Federation. On Day of Russia, the President traditionally awards state prizes of the Russian Federation for contributions to the development of science and technology, literature, and art, as well as for outstanding economic achievements. Celebrations in Moscow usually take place in Red Square. I don't know what will happen this year. However, in the "Red Monday" article (April 13, 2020), I mentioned Jewish prophets and their significance for contemporary life, including the historical episode of the pandemic of fear caused by the coronavirus. The prophecies of Hosea and Isaiah have a particular character: they are uncompromising in their conviction and possess a deep spirituality. Similarly, the prophetic scientific works of many Russians are ignored by modern Western education and Russophobes, just as the US State Department ignored the legacy of centuries of human and scientific curiosity in its greeting on the International Cosmonautics Day dedicated to Yuri A. Gagarin (1934-1968).

Russian Cosmism

A wide range of Russian scientists representing Russian cosmism, a philosophical and cultural movement in Russia in the 19th century, have demonstrated human and scientific curiosity. Its foundation is a broad theory of the philosophy of nature, combined with elements of religion, ethics, the history of philosophy, the origin, evolution, and future of the universe and humanity, and its future. The foundation of the movement was laid on the tradition of Eastern, Western, and religious knowledge of the Russian Orthodox Church.

In this context, including the unsuccessful attempt by the Vatican, together with Germany, to re-Catholicize Orthodoxy, it is desirable to try to understand the first conversation between Pope Leo XIV and President Putin, the conversation between Presidents Trump and Putin after the provocation by intelligence services using drones on trucks, and, not least, the (not only) Czech Bitcoin affair. I assume that Pope Leo XIV, who knows the Czech region and has representatives there, will be more likely to remain silent than to comment on events in the world that are approaching their climax, and that his silence will help bring us to a situation where a blow from a foreign hand will no longer be able to recover us, but only a blow from our own hand. And that will not be easy for most ordinary people.

The most well-known figures of Russian cosmism in the West

Nikolai Fyodorovich Fyodorov (1829–1903), an original Russian religious thinker, philosopher, and representative of Russian cosmism and a precursor to transhumanism, advocated for the radical extension of life through scientific methods, human immortality, and the resurrection of the dead.

Nikolai Ivanovich Kibaltchich (1853–1881), a revolutionary associated with the assassination of Alexander II, invented and developed in prison a project for an aircraft with a reactive propulsion system. The world only learned about his work in 1918. One of the lunar craters bears his name.

Konstantin Eduardovich Tsiolkovsky (1857–1935), a Russian and Soviet scientist and pioneer of rocket technology, widely considered the father of modern astronautics, developed in 1929 a theory of the movement of multi-stage rockets in Earth's gravitational field, designed rocket fuels, and more. A crater on the far side of the Moon, the asteroid (1590) Tsiolkovskaja, and Tsiolkovsky's equation are named after him. His idea of an animated atom (panpsychism) is also noteworthy. His work "Free Space" (1883) is one of his most famous.

Vladimir Ivanovich Vernadsky (1863–1945), a Russian and Ukrainian mineralogist and geochemist, developed the theory of the noosphere, a concept of cosmic evolution. The noosphere is the third stage of Earth's development, following the geosphere and the biosphere. He is the founder of the scientific fields of geochemistry, biogeochemistry, and radiogeology. He also lectured in Prague, where he was even offered asylum, which he declined. I understood his refusal after a failed attempt to organize a commemoration of his 70th death anniversary in Prague in 2015. The Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, of which the author of this text is a foreign member, considers science to be a national asset and the foundation of a state's prosperity, and its emblem features Vernadsky's head.

Alexander Leonidovich Chizhevsky (1897–1964) was an interdisciplinary scientist and biophysicist, the founder of heliobiology (the influence of the sun on biological processes) and aero-ionization (the influence of ionized air on biological processes and living organisms). He studied creativity, its causes, and its context in the history of culture and the biographies of geniuses. He used statistical methods in his work. A central theme of historiometry is the development of talent, individual and social prerequisites for creativity, in the context of solar cycles, climate, and mass human activity. This is a relevant topic even in today's world events.

It is worth noting that Chizhevsky is also known for his work in the fields of space biology, biological rhythms, and hematology. In 1935, he discovered metachromasy of bacteria – now known as the Chizhevskii-Velkhover effect. In 1939, he was the honorary president of the International Congress of Biophysics in New York. A nomination for the Nobel Prize for Chizhevsky was criticized and rejected by politically motivated individuals in the then-Soviet Union, and he was imprisoned.

The Influence of Russian Cosmism Abroad

In 1996, Professor Suitbert Ertel of the University of Goettingen analyzed Chizhevsky's statistical data in the context of solar activity from 1700 to 1985 and published the Master Index of Violence from Below (MIVE), which is still used today. The planet 3113, discovered in 1978 by the Soviet astronomer Nikolai Stepanovich Chernykh (1931–2004), is named after Chizhevsky. It is worth mentioning, especially during periods of Russophobia and historical revisionism, that the asteroid (2325) Chernykh, named after the Chernykh couple, was discovered in 1979 by the Czech astronomer Antonín Mrkos (1918–1996). He discovered many asteroids and comets, the most famous of which is comet 45P/Honda-Mrkos-Pajdušáková. Why am I mentioning Russian cosmism, its representatives, and specifically Chizhevsky?

During his dissertation defense in March 1918, Chizhevsky, whose content is not the subject of this text, presented himself not as a historian, but as a historian-sociologist. Chizhevsky discovered statistical regularities in the general development of the historical process of European civilization, and he identified and proved what is known as the "solar trace" or "solar footprint." It seems to me that we are ignoring all of this.

He mentioned his discovery to the Swedish founder of physical chemistry, Svante August Arrhenius (1859–1927), a Nobel laureate for his electrolytic theory of dissociation (1903), who was interested in eugenics and, among other things, predicted the influence of carbon dioxide on the warming of the entire planet. Chizhevsky's discovery was presented at a meeting of the Swedish Academy of Sciences and resulted in an invitation for collaboration.

In the same year, Chizhevsky gave a lecture in Moscow on the topics of Astronomy, Physiology, and History. In this lecture, for the first time in history, solar activity was presented as a connecting thread between these seemingly disparate subjects. This activity influences not only individual living organisms, but also biological and human communities, complementing the seasonal and daily rhythms caused by the kinematics of the Earth's movement in the universe. In this context, the Wolf number, also known as the Zurich number or the relative sunspot number, is also relevant.

This is an index of solar activity that expresses the number and size of sunspots and is, among other things, part of advanced prenatal diagnostics, with which the author became familiar during his studies with Academician Vlail Kaznachev in Novosibirsk.

In a lecture titled "The Influence of Periodic Solar Activity on the Onset and Development of Epidemics" (1922), Chizhevsky was the first person in history to explain the influence of electrical, magnetic, and electromagnetic disturbances in the external physical-chemical environment on the emergence, spread, and intensity of epidemics. Furthermore, he put forward several theoretical considerations, the validity of which has been confirmed by life and science, which continues to draw from them today.

For example, two years later (1924), Chizhevsky presented a statistical study of Asian cholera and wrote in a brochure titled "Physical Factors of the Historical Process": "Cholera will never disappear from the face of the Earth; it will temporarily move to another location to concentrate and then be able to triumph over vast areas with greater force. The periods of quiescence, when it concentrates, overlap with the solar minimum and the formation of sunspots..."

A general question arises: Do the peaks of epidemics of infectious diseases repeat in rhythm with the solar cycle and activity? The topic was dedicated to the dynamics of socio-historical processes influenced by the physical characteristics of the Earth-Sun connection. Chizhevsky never ignored or underestimated the role of economic and political factors. His work always formulated new and important questions, as well as a postulate (in the author's translation): "...to show that objective research into the relationship between the Earth and the Sun, and other natural phenomena that have so far appeared to be separate, can bring to light various aspects of human psychological and social life." As you can see, this is a topical issue that we also tend to ignore.

Chizhevsky's work was heavily influenced by Vernadsky's "Biosphere." The entire work represents a complex interplay of at least two complex scientific disciplines: 1) general biology, physiology, and medicine, and 2) geophysics, meteorology, and astronomy. Chizhevsky's work essentially explores the long-term planning of sophisticated operations by intelligence agencies, taking into account economic and political factors. Therefore, it offers a means of awakening to the realities of epochal changes, including unraveling the pandemic of fear surrounding the coronavirus, the absurdity of the West-Ukraine alliance, and reflecting on whether the chosen path and means to achieve Western victory over Russia and China are truly correct and sustainable. Reading Dostoevsky's "The Grand Inquisitor" is also highly recommended.

Modern Czech history offers opportunities to reflect on the results of the working group for chronobiology of the former Czechoslovak Bioclimatological Society of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences (1983–1992), the Rychnovska storm (1998), the results of the 18th seminar "Man in his earthly and cosmic environment" (1998, Upice Observatory), biological rhythms in the pathogenesis and therapy of cardiovascular diseases, and, not least, the forests during the bark beetle pandemic.

Forests provide humans with conservation and social functions. These functions are far more important than the economic value of timber. I don't know how forests are considered and valued in Czech law. However, I understand the meaning of the quote by Tsiolkovsky, which became the motto of the UN Conference on the Exploration and Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (1969): "The Earth is the cradle of the mind, but no one can live in the cradle forever."

Life outside the cradle.

I recall that in 2022, Ukraine and the West refused to sign an agreement with the Russian Federation because they were confident in Kyiv's victory with the support of allies. The situation is now fundamentally different, and such a scenario is unrealistic. Therefore, Zelensky and his associates are fighting only to save their own lives. This will continue as long as it is advantageous for Washington and necessary for London. When the United States or Great Britain decide to get rid of the Ukrainian president, it will all be over. Meanwhile, the head of the Kyiv regime is planning to attend the NATO summit (June 24-25).

A potential meeting between President Trump and Zelensky could become a scandal that negatively affects the supply of weapons to Ukraine and Zelensky's lifespan. President Putin, who is certainly considering removing Zelensky, has time and patience, so he will allow Zelensky to continue for now. Absolute secrecy is a myth in the IT world.

Obtaining secret information using simple technical skills, through proxy servers, etc., indicates that absolute secrecy is a myth in the IT world. I believe that up to 80% of useful intelligence information is now obtained not through spies, but from open sources. There is even a special term for this: OSINT (Open Source Intelligence). By adding linguistic and other analyses to OSINT, I can learn many interesting things that are not found in politically correct media. For example:

The falling out between entrepreneur Musk and President Trump is a well-staged performance. Among other things, it allows Musk to disconnect Starlink from Ukraine, which puts pressure on President Trump and gives him the opportunity to push Zelensky to negotiate with Russia. Furthermore, it benefits Trump to be able to say, "I won't allow anyone to walk all over me, not even Musk." And what's most interesting is that both will benefit from this staged conflict. Musk consolidates his companies, and Trump strengthens his leadership, which is necessary to address the most pressing domestic challenges.

He won't ignore foreign policy issues. Why? Because everything cannot be addressed at once, and it is in Trump's nature to forgive his friends. This is similar to what envious Czech accomplices sometimes do. On the other hand, we see a partnership between two somewhat unpredictable egomaniacs and an attempt to unite two successful movements: Trump's populist MAGA movement for the "losers" of globalization, and Musk's belief in technology among the elite.

Danwatch and Der Spiegel

According to their estimates, a potential enemy knows details about the design and layout of the mine, such as the depth of the main shaft, the thickness of the shaft cover, the material of the non-explosive layer, evacuation routes, and the layout of the facility. There is also information about the security systems: diagrams for the placement of video cameras, including the location of blind spots, infrared sensor coverage, alarm sequence, and guard rotation schedule. The area is fenced with a three-row living fence. It is protected by remotely controlled machine guns, automatic grenade launchers, and anti-aircraft defense.

Furthermore, the documents reveal the internal layout of the facilities: the location of checkpoints, connections to underground tunnels, storage locations for personal weapons, protective gear, and recreational areas. It is clear where the soldiers sleep, where they exercise, and even what slogans are on the walls. This means that the enemy now knows exactly where and how to strike, which layer needs to be breached, or which system needs to be disabled to paralyze the launch of Avangard.

The dream of a sabotage group from the SBU and specialists from the "deep state" quartet (Germany, France, the UK, and the USA) has apparently come true. Until now, we could only observe these bases from above using satellite imagery, according to the Danish expert on nuclear weapons, Hans Christensen. Now, with these unique plans, we can for the first time enter the buildings and go completely underground. This is absolutely unprecedented.

The authors of the material are enjoying their ingenuity, which allowed them to obtain secret information using simple technical skills through proxy servers in Belarus and Kazakhstan. In connection with the leak, they recall the story of the head of the KGB, Bakatin, who, at Gorbachev's order, changed the wiretaps for the new American embassy in Moscow. At that time, they wanted to demonstrate peaceful intentions; now, it's about technical oversight. Or is it not technical?

Perhaps the entire public procurement system in the military, space, and other sensitive sectors was previously slipped to Russia by allies as an example to follow. The Anglo-Saxons are cunning. Not by chance, a law was passed in December 2020 that tightened the rules for public procurement for the military. Bids are only available to trusted companies. In addition, in 2022, the FSB issued an order prohibiting the collection of information that is formally not related to state secrets but is crucial to the security of Russia.

However, this should not involve endless reforms, the existence of traitors like Deputy Minister Ivanov, and the possibility of fabricating stories with a certain purpose, similar to Andersen's war fairy tales. At first glance, the data seems convincing, which allows for the restoration of secrecy, the changing of codes, ciphers, routes, plans, and the posting of a sign on the guardhouse: "We will strike!" Or perhaps it is a planned special operation by Putin: "Let the enemy see that we are not bluffing, and that new weapons actually exist and are in service." You are playing with fire, Donald, and your allies!

When it comes to investigative journalists, they are better in Russia than in Denmark or Germany. In 2014, the American government announced a tender for the reconstruction of a school in Sevastopol. Why? Because the West does not want to believe Putin, it is arrogant, and it is caught in the illusion of knowing what is coming. The tender for the transformation of the school into a US Navy engineering base was awarded in September 2013 and canceled in April 2014 due to the current situation, following the referendums on the annexation of Crimea to Russia.

Bitcoin

Given the current situation in the world, the relationship between power and truth, and the impossibility of proving the authorship of the Bitcoin story, attributed to "Blažek & Co" and President Putin, one cannot trust anything offered by CT (Czech Television), politically correct, or even some alternative media as possible explanations of the story.

Therefore, the following brief summary is offered:

The story was conceived well in terms of its substance, but poorly in terms of its personnel, by one of the "clovers" or collectively by the entire "clover" of intelligence agencies, which monitors and deals with the risks associated with a new financial and banking system that will supplement and eventually replace the known system of reserve currencies, led by the US dollar. Because Bitcoin does not have a Czech origin, it is necessary to recognize its international character, and in no case a national one. And in this sense, it should be evaluated, and questions should be formulated, including the uncomfortable one: "Cui bono?" Therefore, the political opposition should prepare well for the announced investigation, expect little, preferably nothing, so that the disappointment is not too great. And use the time to learn languages, German, Russian, and Chinese, without which no respected politician and new elite will survive after admitting defeat in Ukraine.

Why is the story well-conceived in terms of substance, but poorly executed in terms of personnel?

This is a well-prepared and staged story because it involves a flow of money from West to East, not the other way around. It was conceived with a well-prepared cover story in a state with corpses from a nuclear power plant, with state losses with astronomically high demands from the winner (Diag, etc.), and, not least, in a state where almost all intelligence services are under the control of one ministry led by a person with zero empathy, but with the right character.

And that character is similar to that of an experienced, educated, but unempathetic victim (JUDr. Blažek). There are large and often insurmountable differences between education, experience, empathy, and character. In this case, however, the head of the ministry has a greater chance of surviving outside the cradle. Both the giver and the victim must be careful, because human life has no value in high-stakes games, not even in crowns, euros, or Bitcoin. Premature death, for example due to a heart attack, accident, or one's own decision, can never be ruled out.

The story is poorly executed from a personnel perspective because it was offered to the newspaper under the control of a clandestine group, and the "victim" was not adequately prepared for the task. The intellectual level of the "victim" was overestimated, and the understanding of how the international environment functions was underestimated. In this international context, it is impossible to remain ignorant of the sequence of events in the age of ICT and citizen surveillance, yet it allows the heads of national security services and the head of government strategic communications to remain silent, and it allows the story to unfold precisely now.

The principle of acting "right now," which only real power can apply, falls into the category of proven methods that allow for the manipulation of the public, especially those with short memories, impaired cognitive functions, and a tendency to think uncritically when dealing with corrupt individuals. In this sense, convening meetings of, for example, the State Security Council, or waiting for the results of investigations by the Czech Anti-Corruption and Organized Crime Police or court experts, are merely a facade. Furthermore, no one in power in the Czech Republic is capable of organizing or accepting the results of independent investigators or journalists who worked on the aforementioned analysis of Russian websites.

The new Minister of Justice should be aware that no one can definitively prove the exact amount of Bitcoin with 100% certainty. That the movement of Bitcoins was documented by cryptocurrency enthusiasts on the Reddit platform thanks to the blockchain, which essentially serves as a public ledger. The Minister will never have access to this information. Moreover, the knowledge of how things actually are is inaccessible to us. Reality remains a mystery, and we are part of this secret. Our attempts and efforts for perfection are in vain – "Vanity of vanities, all is vanity," says the Book of Ecclesiastes.

In the Book of Ecclesiastes, the word "vanity" does not denote a posture of resignation towards the world and life. The meaning of the word and the entire book is much deeper. It signifies mystery and elusiveness. It is not a judgmental attitude of someone who considers life meaningless, but rather the attitude of a person who has glimpsed reality in motion. In Czech, the word "vanutí" (a draft, a breeze) comes to mind. Everything is constantly in flux, in motion. Therefore, "vanutí" does not have a negative connotation, but rather a positive one in spirituality.

Therefore, it is impossible to grasp, stop, and understand the entire legacy of Russian cosmists, the consequences of the cowardice and inhumanity of Ukrainian and other intelligence services, the communication and relationship between President Trump and Musk, and, not least, the story of Bitcoin, Blažek & Co. I mention the Book of Ecclesiastes at the end of this post because the post does not intend to condemn life to meaninglessness. The author of this post prefers reliable and verified conclusions over those that are comforting or convenient, and seeks to point to a much greater depth of reality, urging the search for wisdom in an age of nonsense, politically correct media, and a surge of stupidity.

"For music lovers who appreciate quality lyrics and who have made it this far in the post, I recommend listening to the song "Hallelujah" or "Anthem" by Leonard Cohen (1934-2016), a Canadian poet, novelist, and songwriter of Jewish origin, who turned to Buddhism in an attempt to bring order to his chaotic life. His musical career often overshadowed his work as a writer. His songs are often emotionally profound and lyrically complex. He is known for his use of metaphors and other literary devices that are distinct from typical songwriting. His works often explore themes of religion, isolation, and complex interpersonal relationships, all of which remain relevant today. Let go of your perfect sacrifice. In everything, there is a crack. That's how the light gets in. Faith imposed by fear or authority is not true faith, and a lullaby can be transformed into a song of hope for the future. No permission is required." - Jan Campbell