Bitcoin has become the new Brno currency, the darknet is a term that refers to encrypted networks that allow users to communicate anonymously and grow fabulously rich, and elections that are controlled by dark forces are at the door.
At a time of the transformation of the financial and banking system into a (darknet) digital one, of the classified results of security committee meetings, of the search for truth in a basin full of lies, treachery, dosimeters and (Brno) sewers, the words of politicians change over time. At first everything is ultra-legal, shortly afterwards the prime minister convenes a security council because the state may have been abused (by whom?) and the rich donor has long since become poor because he has a target on his back, with envy and enemies all around him: the robbed, the businessmen and the many knowing secret services. As the co-author of a book on yoga for children (Search. 2020. P.8) Mrs. Libuše Matysíková (1948) writes: Judgement has been lost, reason has vanished, common sense has perished.
There is a text in the Civil Code, Section 4, which deals with the reason of the average person. What does that section actually say? Let me quote that sentence: It is presumed that every person in his or her own right possesses the reason of an average person and the ability to use it with ordinary care and caution, and that everyone may reasonably expect this of him or her in legal dealings. I must frankly say that the meaning of the legal rule is not entirely clear to me on first reading. As an observer, an analyst, and untainted by God, I am used to reading long, legally and semantically skeletal sentences. But in this case, I had to read the whole text myself several times and reflect on it to understand in all its context what the wise legislator actually wanted to tell us. It is similar in the Blažek & Co story, in the CT commentaries, and it will be the same in the unfolding election campaign. Why?
The phrase in the Civil Code-the reason of the average man, and then that a man endowed with an average reason has the ability to use it, and to use it with ordinary care and caution-is simply wonderful, and proof that the author of such an inspired sentence was not confronted with the necessity of taking his own reason in hand. And proof, too, of stupidity and bullshit, a term referring to misleading, inaccurate, spurious, or false statements, popularly called bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.
One of the most famous quotes by Napoleon Hill (1883-1970) is: Whatever the human mind can conceive and believe can be achieved. Hill is talking about faith, but even that is sometimes not enough. In the first stage, it is necessary to admit that it could be so at all. In the second stage, to actually believe it, and in the third stage, to decide. Yes, you read that correctly. I write that you have to decide because, in short, just believing in a better life is not enough. I recommend reading one of the best-selling books of all time: Thinking Your Way to Wealth.
Attack against the enemy
Classical military doctrines give a number of lessons dealing with offense and defense and the relationship between them. One of the basic precepts is that the attacker has the advantage of usually determining the place and time of the attack. This advantage can be very significant in engagements over a large operational area. On the other hand, this advantage is not absolute, especially if the defender is unable to detect this choice in time or if the choice of attacker is particularly limited. Then the defender's advantage comes in - the ability to prepare better, to fortify in better positions and possibly to think through a counterattack. The attack may be direct, i.e. in front of the enemy, lateral to his flank, sometimes even to the rear; then feigned, deceptive, apparent, diversionary, generally to deceive the opponent about the true place of attack and to divert his attention, i.e. divers. Attacks on fortified places may be, according to Otto's Learned Dictionary:
1) Encirclement, shutting out all contact with the outside world.
2) Surprise attack.
3) Bombing.
4) Regular sieges.
So far, it can be argued that Ukraine acted according to the definition of point 2) in Sunday's series of attacks on Russian air bases. But it cannot be proven that it destroyed over 40 Russian aircraft as it claimed, as satellite imagery available today confirms the destruction or serious damage of at least 13 of them, according to an analysis by The Washington Post. But the fact is that Operation Spider Web is sending back images that, on the face of it, contradict the notion that the war is lost. Ukraine is succeeding in humiliating Russia and U.S. allies just as the West is coming to terms with the Kremlin's intentions.
To make matters worse, Ukraine's SBU intelligence service released a video of the explosion on the strategically important Crimean Bridge yesterday. The bridge did not collapse, but that doesn't mean the attack ended easily for Russia. The explosion, which was triggered underwater, may have damaged thinner struts. If some of them had been destroyed, the bridge could have lost stability. Time will tell. In general, much about the workings of Ukrainian intelligence remains a mystery. What is certain is that the SBU has an extensive network of agents at its disposal, which also allows it to conduct sophisticated operations in Russia itself. Five campaigns have highlighted this in recent years.
Attempted assassination of ideologue Dugin
Dugin is one of the most important ideologues of Russian great power politics and was a likely target. Russian authorities later reported a group of saboteurs who carried out the attack. They accused a Ukrainian man of making an explosive device in a Moscow garage and a Ukrainian woman of planting a bomb under a car. Both may have fled abroad. According to unofficial Ukrainian information, the SBU transported the material for the bomb across the Russian border in a cat cage.
Assassination of the blogger Tatarski
At one of his lectures in St. Petersburg, a young woman who claimed to be his follower gave him a statue. Inside was an explosive device that exploded when Tatarskii looked at the gift. He was killed instantly. Many visitors suffered injuries.
Deadly attacks on two high-ranking generals
In December 2024 and April 2025, two high-ranking Russian military officials were killed in bombings in Moscow and the capital's suburbs. The operations were very similar; both Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov and Lieutenant General Yaroslav Moskalik were killed outside the entrance to their apartment building. In the first case, the remotely detonated explosive device was hidden in an electric scooter, in the second in a parked car. The murders in the middle of Moscow have an internal political component for Zelensky and show the weakness of the Russian intelligence services. Instead of protecting those at risk, they are busy arresting spies, not fifth columnists and traitors.
Bomb explosion in a truck on the Crimean Bridge
On 8 October 2022, a security camera recorded a truck explosion on the bridge. The blast threw part of the road into the sea. A huge fireball ignited a freight train on a parallel railway bridge. Repairing the road and rail link took seven months, during which time Russian logistics were severely hampered. Acts of sabotage against Russian rail transport. The Ukrainians committed numerous acts of sabotage against Russian rail lines during the war. Particularly spectacular - because of the great distance - was a double attack in late autumn 2023 on the Baikal-Amur main line in Siberia. It took place almost 5,000 kilometres from the Ukrainian front.
On 30 November, a freight train caught fire in the longest railway tunnel in Russia. The following day, equipment on a bridge on an alternative route exploded when another freight train passed over it. Damage was limited in both cases and after a few days the railway line was passable again. The cases described above show that the Ukrainian secret service has clear priorities: in the style of the Israeli Mossad, it does not shy away from targeted assassination operations and targets people close to the regime and military leaders. It puts even more weight on attacks on militarily relevant Russian infrastructure.
Apparently, a vast network of agents is either acting alone or using unsuspecting Russians to do so. A prime example of this is Sunday's large-scale attack on the Russian strategic bomber fleet. Containers of hidden kamikaze drones were assembled in a warehouse in Chelyabinsk. Trucks were used to transport the drones using local drivers. The interplay between classical agent activity and technical know-how can be described as successful. Sunday's operation was controlled from a great distance: the drone shelters were opened by remote control, the drones swarmed and the attack took place. The SBU in Kiev was able to monitor the attacks via video.
Notwithstanding this, the attacks have destroyed the remnants of trust, without which neither peace nor ceasefire is possible. Both are unacceptable to the Ukrainian regime. Why? Because in the end peace means the end of the regime and the life of Zelensky, the death of the executors of the plans and the publication of the names of the Albion and NATO advisers. The West is unable to compensate and replace such a loss, because the loss will allow Russia to send concrete destroying bombs to bunkers not only in Kiev. The significance of the recent attacks on Ukraine - war, psychological and proving the art of changing the conduct of war, together with bitcoin, the darknet and elections where and when they would not take place, will not stop the disintegration of a system without vision, but with the illusion of knowing what will happen tomorrow and the day after, not to mention the alarming report on the state of European competitiveness by former ECB chief Draghi on 9/9/2024.
Jan Campbell
English 
Czech 
Spanish 
French 
Italian 
Russian 
Chinese 
German