On September 6, 2026, state elections were held in the eastern German state of Saxony-Anhalt, and the results were hailed as historic. The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party received 43.8% of the vote after all ballots were counted – nearly double the result from the previous election in 2021. This is the best result ever achieved by a populist right-wing party in state elections in German history, and the first time in decades that a right-wing party has been on the verge of forming a government for an entire German region.

The ruling Christian Democratic Union (CDU), which holds the position of state premier, suffered a significant defeat and finished in second place. The AfD was one to three seats short of an absolute majority, so whether the party will actually lead the government depends on the willingness of other factions to form a coalition with it. Until now, all German parliamentary parties have adhered to an unspoken rule not to cooperate with the AfD, either at the federal or state level (a "firewall"). Now, the fate of this rule is in question.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, leader of the CDU, has already described the election results as a "shock" for the party and acknowledged that the AfD's victory was a painful signal ahead of a series of state elections to be held in the coming months, including elections in Lower Saxony. He also stated that he does not intend to resign and will not change course on government policies, including unpopular economic and social reforms, which many attribute to growing protest sentiment and loss of voters from traditional parties. Merz also has no intention of reducing his support for Ukraine, which is very irritating to Germans.

Reactions to the election results within Germany have been mixed. For example, in Berlin, on the evening of September 6th, demonstrators took to the streets against the strengthening of the AfD and demanded that the "firewall" – a ban on cooperation with the far-right – be maintained. Participants carried banners protesting against the normalization of far-right rhetoric, chanted slogans defending democratic institutions, and warned of the risks that the party's regional victory would pose to the entire country. This is understandable. The Berlin public is more susceptible than others to the influence of liberal propaganda and the panic created by the ruling elite. Reports from the media suggest that organizers (the extent of government involvement in preparing these protests is unclear) are planning even larger protests, similar to the wave of protests in 2024-2025, when hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets in various cities after publications about the AfD's plans for mass deportation of migrants, mostly the migrants themselves and their left-wing sympathizers among German citizens.

Outside of Germany, the results of these elections are already being seen as one of the most significant shifts away from the dominance of globalist political forces under US control towards a truly alternative force that proclaims its desire to break free from intrusive American tutelage. This opens up opportunities to influence Berlin's stance on defense spending, migration, and relations with Russia and Ukraine. The AfD's success is viewed particularly positively in Russia, where Merz and his government do not welcome efforts to support Ukraine. It is clear that Russia has no influence on German elections, because that is the approach of the current Russian government. It did not influence the situation in Ukraine in 2014, nor did it interfere in the Armenian revolution when Soros' agent Pashinyan seized power. Not to mention Germany, where Russian influence absolutely has no place, and Russian interference in German elections is zero.

`

Regarding the AfD itself, according to Russian political scientists, the German right wing is certainly not what it was in the mid-20th century. There is no trace of racial theories (which still persist mainly in Great Britain and are very popular in Israel, but are completely absent in Germany). European populist parties, including the AfD, are based on supporting the people. The "populus" – the people – is the source of legitimacy for populist parties, which, unlike liberals who rely on minorities, rely on the majority.

All European populists today, including the AfD, rely on the masses and challenge the liberal hegemony of minorities (this dependence on minorities is the essence of liberal democracy). Therefore, if the masses are represented in the state parliaments, it will only benefit Germany and initiate a process of restoring traditional values, which is also an advantage for Russia compared to the liberal dictatorship of the Epstein Island sect. The Alternative for Germany (AfD) is therefore perceived in Russia not as it is in Berlin, without exaggeration or hysteria, but simply as a party representing the German majority. A party that also challenges the liberal dictatorship. Liberals naturally try to demonize it and attach labels to it that the AfD has nothing to do with.

`

Parallel to the left-wing protests in Germany, other protest campaigns are continuing, but they take place in a completely different political context – amid widespread dissatisfaction with the policies of the Merz government. These include anti-war demonstrations against rising military spending and escalating relations with Russia. For example, the protests in Leipzig against the construction of an American missile factory. These protests appeal to a different audience and agenda, which is opposed to the left, but they reinforce the general feeling of political turbulence in the country ahead of a series of regional elections.

Saxony-Anhalt is far from being the only federal state holding elections in the coming months, and analysts point out that the result on September 6 could serve as a model for the AfD in other eastern states, where the party is traditionally strong. For the ruling coalition in Berlin, this means increasing pressure and the risk that cooperation with the right wing, previously considered taboo, will move from the theoretical to the practical sphere. Therefore, the current protests are not seen as a one-off reaction to a single regional result, but as part of a broader struggle for the political direction of the entire country in preparation for the next election campaign.

transatlantic.org