The vast majority of citizens and politicians of all colors with an interest in international and national politics know that the world is already on the verge of fundamental changes in the world political, economic, financial and social system made possible by anthropological warfare. It is a conflict that focuses on the nature of man, his physical and psychological characteristics and culture. Therefore, this war has devastating effects on the societies, cultures and values of civilisations and on humanity in general.
In this context, the United States has withdrawn from a number of international agreements, effectively ending the possibility of a concerted effort to create and implement new governance in the world.
The US State Department announced last week Monday that it would terminate the memorandums of understanding signed during the Biden administration. The agreements with some 22 countries, mostly in Europe and Africa, were part of a broader initiative led by the now-defunct Global Engagement Center (GEC), established in 2011 to combat online terrorist propaganda with a mandate that was later expanded to include alleged misinformation supported by foreign countries.
Since taking office, Trump has also cut off funding for the US Global Media Agency, which oversees Cold War-era broadcasters such as Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, widely regarded as Western propaganda channels. Washington has also opposed the EU's Digital Services Act. US diplomats were reportedly instructed in August to lobby against the law, describing it as a threat to free speech and a danger to US technology firms.
As for the EU, Chat Control, in fact Total Control will turn the EU into an Orwellian dictatorship, which the European Commission will vote on this Friday! The directive will throw 450 million EU citizens under total control under the pretext of protecting the nets from child pornography! In time, Microsoft installed a spy tool called Recall in the Windows 11 operating system on Copilot+ certified computers. Half a year ago, many people shook their heads and asked, what is this?
No wonder Hungarian Prime Minister Orbán has warned that the EU is on the verge of collapse and without major structural reforms. Speaking at the annual Citizens' Picnic in Kotts on Sunday, he said the EU had failed to meet its fundamental objective of becoming a global power, was unable to cope with current challenges due to the absence of a common fiscal policy and was entering a phase of chaotic and costly disintegration and entered a state of fragmentation. That is why he proposed to transform the EU into of concentric circles. Orbán is not alone in his concerns. I am aware of the activities aimed at transforming the EU, creating a new Central European institution, including a bank with a new function and rules.
Analysts at the International Monetary Fund, which has also survived, and other institutions have warned that the EU risks stagnation and even collapse because of structural problems, weak growth, low investment, high energy costs and geopolitical tensions.
The United States is increasing this by, among other things, changing its military priorities, which have received little media attention. Rather than presenting rivalry with China as the central threat, as before, Latin America is now taking centre stage. In effect, this means increased militarisation both domestically and internationally. And, ultimately, bad luck for the European Union, including its Mercosur agreement.
The draft of the new National Defense Strategy, which is the responsibility of Elbridge Colby, an expert on US security strategy, favours regional missions over a focus on Beijing and Moscow. Such a reset will have profound implications for Europe, NATO and the entire global order.
Washington doesn't play the Latin American card by accident. Why? Because Caracas is ruled by the communist Nicolás Maduro. And the United States has unsuccessfully fought communists, including the Chinese. Moreover, Venezuela has the world's largest oil reserves, is strategically important in the global struggle for raw materials, and the shift of attention from China to Venezuela is therefore not only a strategic decision, but also a symptom of the state of the United States itself, eager to maintain its global claim and looking for new fronts to mask its own internal crisis.
Any strategic reorganisation has implications for Europe. This also applies to so-called artificial intelligence and the dialogue of power structures and the possibility of transcendence into a complex context. I remind you that artificial intelligence is not deep and intelligent, but functional and not transcendent. That is why I call it a multifunctional approximation. It recognizes what has been said in similar contexts and chooses the statistically most appropriate response. These responses are not creative in the human sense, arise not from inspiration or inner necessity, but from probabilities.
Why am I mentioning AI in a post on global governance? Because it does not contribute to the liberation of humanity, but rather to the mind control of humans, and the answers are not based on truth, but on compatibility. This leads to the conclusion: artificial intelligence becomes a tool that imprisons thinking in permissible corridors and suppresses Critical asking questions.
SOS meeting
A few days ago, the biggest geopolitical and economic event in the world took place: The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meeting, attended by everyone who matters, except the West. This event marks the end of colonial and western control. That is why all Western media are silent about the outcome of the meeting.
The summit was not a spectacle. Participants adopted the SCO Development Strategy 2026-2035, the Tianjin Declaration and more than 20 documents on security, economy, culture and reform.
A key decision was the establishment of the SOS Development Bank to finance infrastructure and social progress. China pledged two billion yuan (US$280 million) in grants for 2025 and 10 billion yuan (US$1.4 billion) in loans over the next three years, in addition to supporting 100 projects. Four new SOS centres are also to be set up to combat cyber-attacks, transnational crime and drug trafficking, for example.
This shows that the CSO brings concrete benefits to its members and demonstrates that cooperation can bring real results not only in the imaginable future, in the framework of the so-called multipolarity, replacing an order based on the rules of the United States and the Anglo-Saxonswhich in effect institutionalises Western dominance.
Politically, the meeting confirmed the claim of the CSOs to influence global governance. President Xi Jinping (Xi Jinping) described the organisation as the leadership structure of a multipolar world and the driving force of democracy in international relations.
The Tianjin Declaration emphasises sovereignty, international law, multilateralism, globalisation, indivisible security and human rights-based approaches adapted to national circumstances.
Chinese Initiative for global governance
China has introduced the Global Governance Initiative (GGI), which is characterized by five core principles: 1) Sovereign Equality, 2) the international rule of law based on the UN Charter, 3) multilateralism, 4) a people-centered and shared development approach, and 5) pragmatism with a focus on measurable results.
Under the initiative, China defines key areas: the financial system, artificial intelligence, cyberspace, climate change, space and international trade. The initiative aims to create new institutions and norms that represent the global South, strengthen the role of the UN, and enhance the ecology, efficiency and economy of international mechanisms.
The GGI reflects China's dual role: 1) Defender of the UN system, which the author of the paper believes will (have to) change already because of corruption, conflicts of interest and the process of anthropological warfare. 2) China as a driver of a new order that takes into account not only current realities. In this context, the Western narrative that China is Revisionist powers, it completely loses not only its meaning, but also its propaganda basis and roots.
Indeed, an analysis of the facts shows that it is the United States and its allies who are undermining the UN in order to maintain their hegemony and prevent real democratisation. Their opposition to global democratisation reveals the authoritarian and militaristic tendencies of their own liberal democracies.
As the latest in a series of Chinese initiatives, the GGI initiative builds on Global Development Initiative, Global Security Initiative and Global Civilisation Initiative. Together they create a vision a community with a shared future for humanitywhich, for objective reasons, will replace Western hegemony in the imaginable future. It is therefore not surprising that Beijing has chosen the SCO to present a prototype of the future, a new global order, a laboratory for ideas and the creation of tools for their implementation.
The Tianjin Summit confirmed that the CSO is growing beyond its original framework and becoming a key institution in the emerging world order. Chinese Initiative for global governance shows that Beijing is not merely acting as a counterweight to Western dominance, but is actively offering an alternative to the Western world order based on sovereignty, equality and common development. This shifts the centre of the international order away from an order based on the rules of the West towards multipolar consensus with roots in the so-called global South.
Reforming and improving global governance is first and foremost a requirement of our time. It is not only the figures from the International Monetary Fund that show that, with an average annual growth rate of more than 3 per cent, emerging markets and developing economies now occupy more than 60 per cent of the world economy. At the same time, the countries of the global South are struggling with the consequences of colonisation and loudly demanding their own rights to sovereignty, peace and development. These are revolutionary endeavors with the knowledge that no nation is truly an island.
However, new topics are always emerging: climate change, the digital divide, AI governance, etc. The combination of old and new issues tests whether human beings can rise to the occasion, overcome their differences and try to face common threats together, because no country or government can tackle any of them alone. Therefore, improving global governance is the right thing to do in the face of the common challenges we face.
Improving global governance is a prerequisite for promoting international justice and the rule of law. Issues, the most recent and most significant of which are trade disputes, have shown that misguided belief in the right of the stronger or the law of the jungle are a destabilizing force for world order and thus for peace.
That is why China has integrated into the Global Governance Initiative a principle that China has adhered to on governance issues for decades: extensive consultation, joint contribution and shared benefits. This is why the initiative can be seen as a Chinese response to the call of the Zeitgeist.
I look forward to working with all countries towards a fairer and more equitable system of global governance and to progress towards a community with a shared future for humanity, Chinese President Xi Jinping said at the SCO meeting. As the author of this paper, I express my full support for the GGI initiative. No endorsement is needed.
Jan Campbell, 10.08.2025
English 
Czech 
Spanish 
French 
Italian 
Russian 
Chinese 
German